Life to Itself

Installation view, 2021

Installation view, 2021

Installation view (detail), 2021

Life to Itself is a group exhibition which transforms over time: the works produced specifically for the project are designed to react and change, in relation to the life of the site. Together they compose a sensitive, spectral organism that comes to life in rhythm with the island and its inhabitants.

It is not always easy to think of the earth as a living being1, to perceive its movements, either very slow or too fast, or to understand its cycles with its often distant cause and effect relationships. Life to Itself seeks the vitality of matter, its fugitive rhythms, its mute transformations. Instead of presenting fixed works that are objects of the human gaze, we aim to find chain reactions. Therefore the invited artists place materials such as artificial intelligence, a tree stump, kombucha, water, wicker, salt crystals, micro algae in resonance. Through narrative installations or abstract forms, the works are dynamic systems within a circuit of reactions. Gradually, the works detach themselves from their original state and change: a basin dug in a sofa crystallizes under the action of salt (Bianca Bondi), a skin forms on the surface of a dark container (Tiphaine Calmettes), liquid drips from a ceramic sculpture (Isabelle Andriessen), a film is modified by the life of a tree stump (Grégory Chatonsky), cyanobacteria proliferate (Laure Vigna). As the works are reactive, the idea is that they meet, join forces or parasitise one another. They can also interact with the building and the exterior. What matters is to allow the works to develop on their own, to almost abandon them, in order to allow possibilities to emerge. They will become visible for some time after the exhibition has begun.

Installation view, 2021

Installation view, 2021

Installation view (detail), 2021

The exhibition Life to Itself was planned before the Covid-19 pandemic. During our initial discussions in November 2019, we talked about the way in which the works would parasitise one another. Michel Serres’s book The Parasite (1980) was our starting point: the philosopher explains that the parasite is never invited to a place, but that it always manages to intrude and not necessarily by coming in through the front door. It is difficult to pin down because it constantly transforms itself, sometimes even reversing its role with that of its host. The parasite is not really a fixed entity, but rather a “being in relation”. It forces us to think about things not as objects but as ever-changing sites, dependent on their interactions. Michel Serres gave a lot of thought as to how to approach climate change. One of the steps was to no longer think of things as fixed, but as fugitive and parasitical, in constant transformation.

Since the pandemic began the exhibition was postponed twice: it should have initially take place in summer 2020, then in March 2021. Over time, we have detached from the image of the parasite, perhaps too close to the present tense. Then the idea of a sentient artwork seemed interesting: because the artworks would react to each other, we could say that they were sentient. The works perceive humidity, the movement of other beings, variations of light. They can grow, degrade, form alliances, mutate. Instead of being a fixed set of works to look at, the exhibition could be considered as an assembly of sentient beings. It is then less about how to appreciate the work, to judge its visual qualities, than to ask oneself what it actually is and what it is becoming.

Installation view, 2021

To propose an artwork or an exhibition that is sentient is to give back aesthetic agency to the work itself, and to get away from the classic modality of a subject looking at an object. The sentient work of art no longer needs to be looked at, it simply develops in relation to its milieu, with or without us, humans. To consider the exhibition or the artwork as sentient is a way of respond to the problem of the Anthropocene2: if climate change calls for human beings to shift their focus to better listen to the earth, then we need to find new ways of seeing. To no longer consider the Earth as a resource, but as a sensitive being in relation with other beings, and whose reactions are sometimes imperceptible but have important consequences. Moreover, a sentient artwork can be produced by its connections with other living beings: it has this ability to generate forms that have not been predicted by the artist who originally created it. In relation to its place and to other beings, it transforms, and opens up new possibilities that the action of time calls to light.

Installation view, 2021

Installation view (detail), 2021

1

The Earth as a Living Being is a hypothesis advanced by the scientist James Lovelock. James LOVELOCK, Gaïa: A New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979 (original edition). La terre est un être vivant, l’hypothèse Gaïa, Paris: Editions du Rocher, 1986 (French translation).

2

We entered the Anthropocene period during the eighteenth-century industrial revolution, after
the Holocene period. It marks the moment when humans (Anthropos) became a geological force that influenced the future development of the earth. There are other terms, such as Capitalocene or Plantationocene, that cover the current period of ecological change and the adaptability of the earth, each one highlighting the specific problem which seems the most important.

Life to Itself
Centre International d’Art et du Paysage de l’île de Vassivière, Beaumont-du-Lac
13 June – 5 September, 2021

CREDITS
All images Courtesy: the artists, galleries and CIAP
Photo credit: Aurélien Mole

Artists: Isabelle Andriessen, Bianca Bondi, Dora Budor, Tiphaine Calmettes, Grégory Chatonsky, Rochelle Goldberg, and Laure Vigna